Since the
federal government issued No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, many pros and cons
spread among the nation. This arguable issue, of course, triggers not only the
federal concerns but also local and parents. Some may leave question, why
should it be nationalized schooling system? What is the aim for having the
system? An article of “Power and Control at the State and National Level by Joy
Spring” drives me to an idea of ‘A Nation at Risk 1983’ about quality of the
educational system’ (Spring, 2008, p.226). I did not understand what the
quality of education system that the nation mean until I watched ABC TV video
entitled ‘Master Teacher’. Some scenes lead me to questions. How could a grade
four student not understand the word ‘out’? How could the girl write ‘betaus’
instead of ‘because’? Indeed, these scenes opened my eyes about the reasons of
No Child left Behind. However, some still refute the Act and others show their agreement.
By making a clear line on the positive and negative points on funding, academic
standard and assessment, I will bring this paper into concise conclusion.
Funding. I question how
the existence of NCLB Act could not change the funding system. The statistics
of revenue for public elementary and secondary in 2008-2009 remain lower at 9.5
percent (US Census Bureau, 2011). However, it twists my idea. Funding is really
important factor in implementing the NCLB Act. How the federal with these small
proportion funding encourage schools can hire good teachers, train them to be
qualified in developing curriculum according to the standard and assessment in
order to improve students achievement? Here, I can see the federal shows
responsibility about the Act. Under NEA umbrella, federal provides more
‘Low-Income private Voucher schools’ in which taxpayer dollars are used to
reduce class size, enhance teacher quality and provide every student with
books, computers, and safe and orderly school (Spring, 2008, p. 190). I am
thinking that reducing class size, providing every student with books are easy
to do, but enhance teacher quality is uneasy work. Boyle and McIntyre argue
that teachers need to have more exemplary teacher preparation and professional
development program (2008, p.313). Federal needs to subsidy more sufficient
funding for NCLB runs smoothly, doesn’t it?
Standard and assessment.
Since 2011, federal government has announced an official website about the
standard which each state can adopt it. Among the 50 states, five of them i.e.
Minnesota, Nebraska, Texas, Virginia, and Alaska (Core Standard, 2011) still
prefer to use the state standard system
instead of the national standard. I am wondering, how
could this standard is not compulsory? It is brilliant idea if the all states adopt
it, isn’t it? Each state competes each others to show
the students’ best performance to achieve the standard through testing system
or assessment.
I personify an
assessment as a ruler which details the numbers very accurately. When we want
to make a line from one spot to another, we sometimes draw very good line but
sometimes do not. Why? Obviously just like a ruler, an assessment shows
imperfection on its implementation. It has strong points and weaknesses. In my
understanding so
forth, two basic notions of the assessment are named as high-stakes test and
low-stakes test. The former which is done annually for grade 3 to 8 has more
consequences than the latter which is only for grade 4 and 8. Indeed, it is because
high-stake testing able to
make a school being label as ‘failing
school’. I see the concept of labeling
school may bring good and negative at the same time, competition and cheating. This
would be good since every single school competes and wants to achieve the good
score. But, low performance schools legalize cheating such as erasing incorrect
responses and changing into correct response, and supplying hints for the correct
answer (Popham in Spring, 2008, p.232). It may be a good idea to have intensive monitoring by
a sudden superintendent visit and changing teachers for the test. Take one
county as an example. If one
county has around 18 schools, the teachers in school A may supervise
kids in school B. School A teachers give more supervising and watch to students
to the last minutes. In my perspective, it may at least reduce numbers of
school administration cheating. It
is because the teacher will minimize the interaction to the students since they
do not know each other and they do not want to this kids have higher score than
his/her pupils.
It
is very hard to give a judgment on the No Child Left Behind Act. Just like two
sides of a coin, the Act presents advantages and disadvantages at the same
time. So, do you agree with the No Children Left Behind Act? State your point!
References
Boyle & McIntyre. (2008)
What kind of experience? Preparing teacher in PDS or community setting. In M.C. Smith, et al. (eds), Handbook of
Research on Teacher Education Third Edition, pp. 307-329. New York: Routledge.
National
Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State
Standards. Washington DC. National Governors Association Center for Best
Practices Publiser. Retrieved from www.corestandard.org
Master Teacher, ABC TV video
Spring, J. (2008). American Education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
U.S. Census
Bureau. (2011). Public Education Finances: 2009 (G09-ASPEF). Washington DC. U.S.
Government Printing Office. Retrieved from www.census.gov
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar